Rabu, 18 Februari 2009

Would You Like More Information on the DreamBox 7020Si Satellite Receiver

By Kristi Ambrose

Well, you're in luck, because listed in this article I have some superb information about the DreamBox 7020Si (Satellite Reciever) as well as a few other receivers that are available online. All of these receivers are made in China and have incredible quality. They look, act, and feel exactly like the real deal. Remember kids, just because something is cheaper than it is other places, doesn't necessarily mean it's cheaper in quality! Take eBay for example, they have some of the best prices anywhere and it is very rare to go there and find a real junker. Same goes with these receivers! Plus, all the receivers listed below have not only a really nice price tag and some spectacular specs but, they also have been reviewed very highly! Alright, let's get the show on the road. First things first:

DreamBox 7020Si (Satellite Receiver) -
The is the Dreambox 7020 Si digital satellite receiver with full Ethernet communication capabilities. Power PC driven with Linux operating system for endless possibilities, 250 MHz PowerPC Processor(350 Mips). Anything with Linux is considered the way to go these days. If it doesn't have a Linux then there is something seriously wrong, and you need to move on and see what else you can find!

Specs-
-Linux open source (most parts under the terms of GPL)
-Integrated Compact Flash Interface Slot
-1 x DVB Common-Interface Slot
-2 x Smartcard-Reader
-MPEG2 Hardware decoding (fully DVB compliant)
-Supports Linux Standard API (Direct-FB, Linux-FB, LIRC)
-Big LC-Display
-USB Port
-10/100 MBit compatible Ethernet Interface
-Modem
-12V switch cinch
-V.24/RS232 Interface
-Common NIM DVB-S
-32 MByte Flash
-Channel-change time 1 second
-96 MByte RAM
-Unlimited channel lists for TV/Radio
-Integrated IDE UDMA66 Interface
-Supports directly bouquet-lists
-Support for internal HDD in any capacity
-Full automatic service scan
-Supports EPG (electronic program guide)
-Supports multiple LNB-Switching control (supports DiSEqC)
-RF modulator
-S/PDIF Interface for digital bit stream out (AC-3)
-Supports own videotext
-Audio/Video cinch out
-Fully adaptable OSD in many languages and skin-support
-2 x Scart-interfaces
-MINI-DIN connector for extern IR (send)
-DreamBox DM7020Si Parts

OpenBox 800X Satelite -
The OpenBox 800X digital satellite receiver has been tested for over 10 months by hundreds of users and turned out to be one of the most reliable products. The OpenBox 800X digital satellite receiver is a new highly stable and reliable hardware product based on a new thoroughly tested hardware platform which has proved to be extremely safe and efficient even after months of heavy tests under extreme loads.

Specs -
-4500 programmable channels
-On-screen display in 8 languages
-1 x RCA dla AC3
-2 x SCART
-DiSEqC 1.0/1.2
-Teletext
-EPG support
-Symbol Rate 1~45Mbauds
-Zoom - 4:3, 16:9 Format
-MPEG 2 / DVB compatible
-Timer, clock
-950-2150 MHz range
-Lists of favourite programs
-SCPC/MCPC, C/Ku- Band
-2 x RCA Audio
-1 x CA Slot

Relook 200S -
Relook 200S is a very popular receiver and extremely easy to use with lots of features.

Specs -
-Set all values for searching programs in one menu page
-Satellite List by exclusive RCU button
-Subtitle & Teletext (OSD)
-Aspect Ratio: 4:3, 16:9
-LINUX open source (some parts under the terms of GPL, accordingly expandable)
-4,000 Channels Programmable
-Powerful Channel Sorting and Grouping
-Favorite Channel Lists for TV
-Parental Control & Radio and Video Mode
-"ETHERNET SUPPORTED"

All of the products within this article have received highly rated reviews amongst people that have either tested out the products or that have bought the products, so any of these products would be a great thing to look into buying! Good luck in your purchases.


Support for SEO Indonesia

Phyllis Yancy - On The Move

By Fran Briggs Platinum Quality Author

Phyllis Yancy's custom jewelry designs are untouchable; the quality, unquestionable. Just ask 2005 "American Idol" finalist, Anwar Robinson and actor, Malcolm Jamal Warner. Amazingly, the entire line is unique, handmade, and designed by Phyllis Yancy herself. Poised and vibrant in every sense of the words, Yancy founded Phyllis Yancy Designs more than ten years ago. Over this period, clients and customers have been mesmerized by beautiful Czech jewelry designs, Swarovski-cut crystals, Afrocentric beads, and other culture designs. Today, fueled largely by well-lit ambition and an exuberant passion to creatively enhance the lives of others, Yancy hopes to corner a relatively untapped and much-needed market -- mens' customized jewelry. And, if the male luminaries and celebrities she has as clients are any indication of early success, Phyllis Yancy is in great shape. Recently, EmediaCampaigns! sat down with Phyllis. We talked about her inspirations, devotions, her future projects, and of course, Phyllis Yancy Designs.

Fran Briggs: Good afternoon, Phyllis. Thank you for taking the time to speak with us.

Phyllis Yancy: Oh, thank you, Fran... What a great opportunity!

F.B. Lovin' your energy, Phyllis. Could you tell us more about your background?

P.Y. Yes. I've been married for seven years to a wonderful supportive man, Ernest Yancy. I have great family members on both sides. Beautiful parents, two incredible sisters, and the best in-laws one could ask for. Yep, surrounded by beautiful spirits. I graduated in 1998 with a master's in Integrated Marketing Communication from Roosevelt University, Chicago. Currently, I work in management at a major non-for-profit Association here in Chicago. I call this my 'meantime' job. Let's just say, I'm ready to 'live on purpose.' We all know, our world changes when we change.

F.B. Your jewelry is adorned by thousands. What is the inspiration, behind the inspiration of your handmade, custom-designs?

P.Y. The inspiration is the feeling I get when I custom-design a piece for someone and then receive such appreciation from that individual. When I know I have touched their spirit, I know my work is done! It is that very feeling that keeps me inspired.

F.B. "2005 American Idol Finalist," Anwar Robinson was seen on tour sporting several pieces of your designs. Could you briefly tell us how that came about?

P.Y. Briefly? (laughs) That might be hard for me! Okay, I will try... This is how my mens' line originated. I was home watching American Idol when contestant, Anwar Robinson came stage and began to sing Dionne Warwick's song, I Know I Will Never Love This Way Again. Now keep in mind, I didn't know anything one way or another about Anwar Robinson. As he was singing, I noticed he had on a beautiful, chocolate brown, velvet blazer and opened collar shirt. And yep -- nothing on his neck! Neck just bare. I looked and thought to myself, 'Man, Anwar, you need some jewelry.'

Okay, this is going to sound crazy but, all of a sudden, a small voice whispered in my ear: 'Well, why don't you make him some?' I jumped; (and) looked around because, the voice seemed so real to me. As if someone was there. I mean, no 'Come hither, thou...', just, 'Well, why don't you make him some?' I immediately went downstairs to my craft room and started creating jewelry for Anwar. Keep in mind, I had never designed men's jewelry before -- only women.

Well, to make a long story short, God showed me how to get the jewelry to him. Again, ordering my every step. It was because of that experience, I found that there is a market out there that the jewelry industry has missed -- men. Especially artists in the entertainment industry that don't necessarily want the enormous jewelry, i.e., 'Bling Bling!' but (rather) more cultural designs that connect with their spirit.

From this, God has blessed me and led me to design for several artists, including Malcolm Jamal Warner, Will Downing, Frank McComb, KEM, Che', Dave McMurray and Shelby Brown. I am now getting many artists from all backgrounds contacting me with great interest.

F.B. What an awesome story, Phyllis. It illustrates the importance of responding to our empowering, inner voice. Tell us, why do think designer beads are enjoying a resurgence in popularity these days?

P.Y. I think people are learning how to appreciate art in all forms. The beauty and energy these beads represent, the unique power to promote good health, and spiritual well-being has become an attraction. For example, people like to wear a carnelian stone for inspiration and prosperity. Tiger-eye stones represent clarity and peace. It is because of these positive energies and beliefs that God has brought my work to me. And, it's up to me to embrace the mysteries of this wonderful work.

F.B. Your product line and entire collection are both exemplary and unique. Was there ever a time when you doubted your ability to design such beautiful pieces?

P.Y. Sometimes I wonder if I will run out of ideas or if I am prepared for the "supply and demand" of my product. But mostly, I know God has given me a gift and I plan to obey the call and continue sharing this gift! When I feel I'm falling into a creative slump, somehow the Universe always brings an artist or customer my way, which gets me motivated all over again!

F.B. When did you first discover your passion and gift for creating beautiful, custom-designed jewelry?

P.Y. I always had a love for jewelry as a child. Funny story... I made my first pair of earrings for me and my sister with 'bobby pins.' I even made them dangle like chandeliers! My parents would not let us wear earrings at the time, so we had to make do! As far as designing real jewelry, I didn't realize that until 1995. This is yet another unbelievable story! While I was in undergraduate school, each student in one of my classes was charged with creating an artistic project. I told my instructor, 'Sorry, I don't have an artistic bone in my body.' He laughed and said, 'I think you will be able to come up with something; I believe in you!'

The very next day I decided to go to Michael's Arts and Craft Store. I walked down each aisle to see what would resonate with me. Well, I found myself in the aisle with the jewelry-making material and guess what? The rest is history. Never in my wildest dreams did I think I had any creative abilities! From there I did craft shows, home shows and sold to a couple of beauty salons. Lately, I'm finding my passion for designing one-of-a-kind pieces for men. We women can find jewelry everywhere we look, but for men ... the options are limited.

F.B. Most entrepreneurs have mentors as it pertains to the day-to-day operations of their businesses. Is this the same for you?

P.Y. Yes, I have spiritual mentors. Authors, Marianne Williamson, Wayne Dyer, Les Brown, Iyanla Vanzant and Deepak Chopra just to name a few. I read a lot of inspirational and motivational books and listen to tapes daily. I really believe if I can learn to create balance in my life, be opened to what God has for me, He will bring everything and everybody to me in order to do this business. When we live on purpose and live an inspired life, I don't believe we have to force anything or manipulate.

What God has for us, is for us! So my goal is to live a spiritual surrendered life and not be attached to any results. This automatically helps me with the day-to-day operations.

F.B. It's not atypical for an individual or organization to consult with others as it pertains to adding clarity to their vision. Who is responsible for helping clarifying the vision for Phyllis Yancy Designs?

P.Y. First, my husband, Ernest. He has this sort of quiet strength about him (which) brings me back to reality and helps me see the big picture. I sometimes lose that in all of the excitement! He keeps me focused...My sisters and a couple of girlfriends are always there letting me bounce ideas off of them, while also sharing their thoughts on what they think might work. My nephew, being the artist that he is has also been instrumental in helping me clarifying my vision for the company. Again, it's a blessing to have such a support team!

F.B. When are you most happiest?

P.Y.When I see an artist on stage proudly wearing a Phyllis Yancy Design -- whether that artist is considered 'famous' or not.

F.B. What's next for Phyllis Yancy?

P.Y. I would like to start focusing on marketing to retail stores such as Macy's, Neiman Marcus, Nordstroms, etcetera. We will see!

F.B. Believing all the best for you and your endeavors. Before we leave, please tell us how consumers can learn more about, or purchase your designs.

P.Y. I am currently revamping my website (http://phyllisyancydesigns.com) and giving it a totally new look. For now, I encourage those who are interested to visit my "myspace" page at http://myspace.com/phyllisyancydesigns for photos, contact information, and the possibility of having a custom-designed piece made for them.

Fran Briggs: Phyllis Yancy, thank you so much for sharing. Indeed, it was both a pleasure and an honor talking with you.

Phyllis Yancy: Thanks Fran, this has been fun! I always enjoy speaking with you. Continue your great work and many blessings to you.

eMediaCampaigns! interviewed Phyllis Yancy in February, 2007. To contact Phyllis personally, please send an email or visit her websites.

e-mail : custsvc@phyllisyancydesigns.com

websites: Phyllis Yancy Designs

http://myspace.com/phyllisyancydesigns

Address:

Phyllis Yancy Designs

P.O. Box 11760

Chicago, IL 60610

For more information on the OnTheMove! series, contact eMediaCampaigns@aol.com or http://franbriggs.com

Fran Briggs is the President and founder of The Fran Briggs Companies, a personal development organization which helps people take their potential beyond the max. She is also "a motivational speaker of the inspirational kind" and has written several articles, manuals, and books. This prominent voice of motivation speaks to audiences of children and adults of all ages and backgrounds with the aim of inspiring them to their respective levels of greatness. For more information including how to book Fran for speaking engagements, visit http://www.franbriggs.com

Leverage - Margin Debt

By Henry Lu

What is leverage?

Here is a definition of leverage from an online dictionary
"leverage - The use of credit or borrowed funds to improve
one's speculative capacity and increase the rate of return
from an investment, as in buying securities on margin."

Essentially, the core idea of leverage is that investors can
use less money to control bigger amount of investment so
that investors can make more money when the price movement
is in investors' favor. In fact, the investment involved in
leverage does not have to be stocks, it can be bonds, or
real estate, or any other investment vehicles. It does not
have be margin or debt either. Options (put or calls),
warrants are special kind of leverage where small amount of
dollar can control much bigger amount of common stocks.

Leverage is common tool available for individual investors.
Whenever we open a brokerage account at pretty much any
broker, such as E*trade, TD Waterhouse, etc, we can enable
margin or option feature pretty easily. Because options
usually are not favorable leverage tool for value
investors, I generally do not recommend options for
investment purposes. This article will focus mainly on
margin to illustrate the concept and usage of leverage in
stock investment.

Leverage - how it works?

Margin is open-ended debt that investors borrow money
forever as long as the margin requirements are met. Right
now at this low interest rate environment, brokerages
typically charge about 5% - 7% interest rate on margin
debt.

Here is an example how an investor can make more money by
using margin. Suppose John had $10,000 deposited into a new
brokerage margin account 5 years ago. Margin interest rate
was 5% for past 5 years. John has invested into only one
stock XYZ with 20% yearly smooth performance( there was
rarely such stock existing, just a hypothetical one) for
past 5 years.

Case 1

If John did not use any margin and fully invested that cash
into stock XYZ, the past 5 years performance was 20% per
year or 149% total performance for 5 years as in Table 1.

Table 1 Full investment into XYZ, no margin.
year Account Equity Value

start $10,000

year1 $12,000

year2 $14,400

year3 $17,280

year4 $20,736

year5 $24,883

Case 2 If John invested $20,000 into XYZ in his account and
borrowed $10,000 money on margin 5 years ago, every year
John had to pay 5% interest or $500 margin interest, but the
investment performance was 30% per year or 273% total
performance for 5 years as in Table 2. That is significantly
higher performance than Table 1 case.

Table 2 Borrowed $10,000 on margin. 5% margin interest

year Account Equity Value

start $10,000

year1 $13,500

year2 $17,800

year3 $23,060

year4 $29,472

year5 $37,266

Leverage - are there any trap?

By looking at table 1 and table 2 cases, should we all rush
into margin tomorrow? Not yet. There is serious flaw in
above 2 cases.

In real life, you can rarely find a stock performed like
above example XYZ! In fact, investors should never expect a
stock can rise smoothly over relatively long time frame.

Here is a typical stock XYZ would have done for 5 years. The
5 years performance was still 20% per year in average, but
not smoothly. In the beginning of second year, due to a
short term negative event, XYZ lost 60% of price suddenly
and recovered all losses and gained 20% that year at year end.

Now let's redo that math for above cases.

Case 1 If John did not use any margin, the 5 year
performance was no difference. John did not sell during the
second year 60% loss and he still made 20% for that year.

revised Table 1 Full investment into XYZ, no margin.

year Account Equity Value

start $10,000

year1 $12,000

year2 $14,400

year3 $17,280

year4 $20,736

year5 $24,883

Case 2 If John invested $20,000 into XYZ and borrowed
$10,000 money on margin 5 years ago into that portfolio,
The beginning of second year John had $24,000 in XYZ with
roughly $10,500 margin on it. Because XYZ lost 60% suddenly
during that year, which triggered margin call, John's
broker liquidated John's account and John lost everything on
year2! John's account was wiped out

revised Table 2 Borrowed $10,000 on margin. 5% margin
interest

Account Equity Value

start $10,000

year1 $13,500

year2 $0

year3 $0

year4 $0

year5 $0

Let's think about above revised tables. XYZ stock was not really
bad stock, it performed well with 20% return over past 5
years. However, by misusing margin, John actually lost
everything and got wiped out!

Don't use leverage, don't use margin if you do not fully
understand it!

Rule No. 1 - Forget about reward, focus on safety

The No.1 reason investors want to use leverage is to make
more money, not to lose money. Wipe out is especially bad.

Over past decades of stock investment, I made lots of
mistakes before, speculation and losses at earlier years,
misjudgment of stock analysis, etc. But one thing I never
encountered that I never got wiped out because I have always
been aware of the danger of margin and danger of leverage
lure.

I have seen online BBS discussions that somehow wipe out is
beneficial to investor and a great investor must go through
multiple wipe outs. Maybe one wipe out was not that bad for
an individual so that he/she can learn a lesson in earlier
years. Something must be wrong if the investor went through
multiple wipe outs. He/she was not learning from past
failures.

The risk of margin comes from the volatility of stocks and
diversification degree of portfolio. To avoid risk of margin
leverage, investors can study past chart of stock price, and
diversify portfolio into different stocks or different
industries. While a value investor does not have to care
that much about short term stock price movement, a value
investor must take extraordinary caution on analyzing the
volatility of a stock if he/she is using leverage in stock
investment.

While past stock price volatility and portfolio
diversification are all relevant, there is more to consider
on leverage. Here comes Rule No.2 below.

Rule No. 2 - the riskier the investment, the less the
leverage

The key thing to avoid wipe out in leveraged investment is
to use leverage based on risk of investment. The more risk
of portfolio, the less leverage or less margin can be used.

The risk can not just be past volatility, a value investor
must do home work of business analysis of company profits or
earnings to assess the risk of investment.

Real estate is relative safe so that homeowners or real
estate investors can use 4-1 to 10-1 leverage to buy a
house on mortgage.

Banks use up to 100-1 leverage and most local banks in USA are
pretty safe. Bank business is essentially like a leveraged
investment. Banks borrow money from retail depositors and
lend out money with mortgage or business loans. We can
consider mortgages or business loans are "investment
vehicle" of banks. The interest difference between checking
account (0%-1%), or CD (2%-3%) and mortgage or business
loans (5% to 8% or more) is what banks are making. Because
interest rate up or down volatility is not as big as that of
stocks, 100-1 leverage is not really as scary as it may
appear in many cases.

Value investing is just a "special" kind of business just
like bank business or real estate investing. Value investors
can evaluate leverage usage just like a bank or real
estate investor. There is nothing truly wrong with leverage
if investors can properly use it. The value investor master
Benjamin Graham said clearly in his book Intelligent
Investor, that it is perfectly OK to use margin to profit
from some bond arbitrage opportunities while it is actually
very unwise to load full bunch of hyped up penny stocks in a
cash account!

Rule No 3 - Look for minimum 2-1 margin interest coverage

In typical security analysis, an interest coverage of 4-1 or
2-1 minimum ratio is usually standard criteria to assess the
risk of bond investment. If a company's pretax or
pre-interest earning is $4 per share, and its debt interest
is $1 per share, it meets the 4-1 interest coverage ($4
divided by $1) and therefore the company's bond is
considered as safe investment.

The same concept can be applied to leveraged value
investment. This is particularly true for certain bond-like
investment like REIT or high dividend stocks. If the
investment reward is less than 2-1 ratio, don't even
consider to use any leverage.

Case study on FB Here is case study of my past 2001 stock
pick Friedman, Ramsey Asset (Ticker FB, now merged into
FBR). In 2001, FB was trading right at its book value with
18% dividend yield, and it was REIT stock. Its business
model was leveraged mortgage investment by borrowing short
term loans with 3% and investing into long term Fannie Mae
or Freddie Mac mortgage with interest of 5%. FB utilized
10-1 leverage on this 2% interest rate spread and made
nearly 20% return to support this 18% dividend yield.

FB business risk is mainly from interest rate risk. Because
the mortgage was guaranteed by a quasi-government company
Fannie Mae or Freddie Mak, there was little credit risk
involved in FB business model. In fact, compared to banks'
sometimes 100-1 leverage ratio, FB business leverage was
pretty low and reasonable. After an internet bubble, I
predicted that interest rate would be quite stable
if not lower. The stock volatility was not issue as well. If
FB stock price dropped below book value too much, FB company
and its affiliate FBR would simply buy up its common shares
instead of investing into mortgages.

Considering 18% dividend yield vs 5% brokerage margin
interest, there was nearly 4-1 ratio of margin interest
coverage if I use margin to buy FB stock, which was exactly
what I did in 2001. During 2001, 2002 and 2003, FB was very
solid stock delivering 18% dividend yield. After the merger
with FBR, FB+FBR almost doubled from where they were couple
of years ago.

Of course, FB investment was just one position of my
diversified portfolio together with NEN and other stocks.
But the rule of 2-1 minimum margin interest coverage can be
applied to other positions as well.

Certainly with portfolio full of safe stocks like FB, or
NEN or other similar value stocks, using a small amount of
margin made sense to enhance performance back in 2001 even
though the market was horrible then. If the stock was a tech
stock like CSCO or YHOO, margin would have been disastrous
and sure way to wipe out an account.

Currently with 7% dividend yield and rising interest rate
outlook, FBR is no longer as safe and profitable investment
as FB was in 2001. FBR no longer qualifies my margin
interest coverage requirement today.

OK, that's all for today, remember Don't use leverage until
you fully understand it!

Article by Henry Lu of BlastInvest LLC, a premium investment newsletter publisher in Connecticut. Visit http://www.BlastInvest.com for FREE "how-to" investing assistance, web services and more.

Support for SEO Indonesia

Learn How the Apple iPod Classic and the iPod Video Differ

By Frederick B Johnson

With so many new products on the market, it's becoming more and more of a challenge to find that ideal "fit". Each company is intent to add on to, and improve, their original creations, swamping the stores with a myriad of products that are sometimes no more different from one another than a simple repositioning of a single button.

Apple would appear to be setting the record though - now introducing its new 6th generation iPod: the Classic. Despite the title, however, this "Classic" isn't so very classic at all. Updated with all of the latest technology, it sends its predecessor - the iPod Video - on a run for its money.

Where the Video had hard drives consisting of 30, 60, or 80 GB; the Classic has reached its full potential at 160 GB. Originally found in either 80 or 160 GB, Apple seems to have settled in the middle ground. The internal hard drives themselves are extremely different from each other in nature and setup (the drastic size contrast aside), and are responsible for the significant bulk of the otherwise sleek design. The 80 GB Classic is ideally thinner while its 160 GB counterpart seems almost brick-like.

Unfortunately, these devices don't have any interchangeable parts with one exception: the headphones (each comes with its own type, but you can easily switch the two if you wanted). The iPod Video's LCD screen works only with its own hard drives - be that 30, 60, or 80 GB - while the Classic's LCD has the potential to span across everything - 30, 60, 80, 120, or 160 GB.

The appearances of both the Video and the Classic are easily confused at first glance, but upon taking a closer look one would realize that the Video sports a sleek, plastic faceplate (making it rather scratch and damage resistant). The Classic, on the other hand, has brought back the original, aluminum casing and comes in your choice of either silver or black coloring.

They both have a metallic backing and both share the same battery attachment qualities (being connected to the frame as opposed to soldered - making it easier to replace). Both devices have a full range of color pixels for displaying pictures, videos, or music files. The Classic comes with an updated (and very flashy) interface that many users seem to enjoy. In addition, the Classic's battery life introduces a whopping 40 hours of audio and 7 hours of video.

Frederick B Johnson is an author from Milliamp LTD, a company that performs quality video ipod repair services for North America and beyond.

Support for SEO Indonesia

Senin, 16 Februari 2009

Know the Differences Between the Apple First and Second Generation iPod Touch

By Frederick B Johnson

Among the multitudes of new products that have been released in recent years, the 1G and 2G iPod touches are perhaps the most oblivious to consumers because of their evident similarities. Indeed, at first glance, the two devices almost appear one and the same. It takes a trained and steady eye to notice the subtle additions to the 2G Touch.

Commonly (and mistakenly) referred to as the "iTouch", the 2G iPod Touch is a much more compact, rounded, and sleek version of it's 1G predecessor. With tapering curves and a lighter mass, it fits remarkably into any sized palm - enabling a better grip in even the most questionable of situations. In addition to that, Apple even threw in a volume control button - located on the side of the 2G.

Sporting a new speaker inside its smaller frame as well as a new Microphone capability, the 2G's outward appearance seems somehow more collected than the original Touch, even though the amount and noticeability of the differences are not the most distinguishable.

Beneath the cover, however, lurks a collection of new attributes. Even though the batteries on both iPods remain soldered to the frame, the LCD screens have undergone dramatic improvement in the leap from one generation to the next. Originally, the LCD and the glass screen were one and the same - part of the same component that made up the Touch's monitor. In the 2G platform, though, these aspects have been separated - that is, the LCD and the glass are two distinct pieces, making replacement or repair a much easier (and cheaper) operation.

The backplates on both iPods remain difficult to open, making the service of an accomplished repair shop a necessity. Also, both generations are comprised of either the 16, 18, or 32 GB hard drives. Neither have cell phone capability (yet) - even though they're often confused with Apple's iPhone. Both devices are Wi-Fi compatible, too.

Also, for the curious minds out there, both generations have full access to and use of the applications found in the Apple store. One thing you won't find on the original iPod Touch, however, is the new Nike + iPod integration - which is great motivation for anyone that visits a gym. The application monitors and records the distance (and pace) of a walk or jog through the use of an embedded accelerometer. The information can be accessed on the iPod itself or via the iTunes software.

Frederick B Johnson writes for Apple iPod Repair company Milliamp LTD, which excels in ipod video repair, in addition to fixing both generations of the iPod touch.

Support for Busby SEO Test

Differences Between the First Generation iPhone and the iPod Classic

By Frederick B Johnson

Apple has created an extraordinary legacy for itself by introducing the world to its ever-popular iPods and iPhones. Despite the initial impression when hearing its name, however, the most recent iPod - the iPod Classic - is actually a 6th Generation innovation, incorporating all of the finest characteristics of it predecessors and maintaining a decent reputation for itself.

In contrast, the 1st Generation iPhone has laid the groundwork for the company's gradual branching of products. Recognizing their ingenuity, it seems Apple had struck a cord in the market's approval when it introduced it's now world-renowned multitouch interface. Equipped with Safari browser, the iPhone has proven itself to be the superior purchase for any user. It lacks Bluetooth capability - which is certainly a downside for many interested buyers - but its performance more than makes up for its flaw.

Encased in a durable, plastic frame the iPhone has sleeker, shinier look than the iPod Classic - which happens to have a similar construction process to the iPod Nano, sporting an anodized aluminum face and glass screen. The iPod Classic is difficult to scratch, but fingerprints and smudge marks should be an expected inconvenience - as with the iPhone.

In addition to its glossy exterior, the 6th Generation iPod Classic comes in a user's choice of either 80 GB or 160 GB worth of storage space. It promises up to 30 hours of audio (5 hours of video) or 40 hours of audio (7 hours of video) for each size respectively.

While the original iPhone's battery life is weak by comparison, it more than makes up for it with the implemented correction software - which makes typing on a touch-screen a breeze for even the biggest fingered users. Unfortunately, however, both devices lack any backwards compatibility. The iPhone has no predecessor to speak of and the iPod is simply separate from its 5G ancestor.

The iPod Classic does introduce three brand new games, however, that come free with the device. They're the only three games available for the 6G, but have a rather decent following - at least as far as games go. The Classic has a very user-friendly interface - which the iPhone can boast as well - the only real differences come with preference and purpose.

A forewarning to those that might enjoy the iPhone as an MP3 though: the headphone jack has been a source of frustration for many users. Because of its design, third-party headphones aren't able to connect - requiring a rather pricey adapter.

Frederick B Johnson writes for the premier iTouch repair company Milliamp LTD, which also repairs iPhones and other iPod models.

Support for Busby SEO Test

The Difference Between the iPhone 3G and the 2nd Generation iPod Touch

By Frederick B Johnson

To the untrained eyes, Apple's recent iPhone 3G and the 2nd Generation iPod Touch seem to be one and the same - at least by their appearances. They both feature a high resolution, 3.5 inch screen that blends flawlessly into the sleek, smooth frame it's fastened to.

Both have tapered edges that make the gadget feel much smaller than it actually is and allow for a comfortable grip by anyone's standards. The plastic exterior is debatable - slightly fragile in comparison to both devices' original aluminum frame. The iPod Touch, however, is arguably more durable than the iPhone 3G - however, they both share a susceptibility to fingerprints or smudges.

There have been quite a few new (and original) implementations for both devices, however. The iPhone 3G, for example, has an interesting sensor able to detect the proximity of the device to your ear. It also comes equipped with a battery that allows for up to 5 hours of talk time (25 hours of music, if you so prefer).

The iPod Touch has an interesting "Genius" feature that enables the user to create an instant 25-song playlist comprised of the same musical attributes. That is, 25 songs immediately labeled as being similar in sound by the computer. It won't work if the "Genius" feature is disabled on your iTunes account, however. For those users that prefer their privacy, this can be a hassle because of the way iTunes monitors the playlists.

Apple has seen fit to introduce a higher speaker volume for their iPhone 3G, but - unfortunately - has kept things respectively the same for their iPod Touch. Performance in both devices is doubtlessly superior to other brands on the market. The iPhone has an average speed of 300 to 500 Kbps but, in comparison to networks abroad it can reach speeds of 700 to 800 Kbps.

The iPod Touch matches its iPhone counterpart in the smaller details of performance. Things like the album covers and scrolling menus are glitchless and remarkable smooth. You can resize photos or flip images in the same flawless rhythm that you've always dreamt about.

The iPhone has one up on the iPod Touch, however, when it comes to software. Because of Apple's implementation of the Skyhook WiFi-based GPS system, a user will always know exactly where they are. It's superior to anything else found in the market and incorporates the kind of technology that we believed only to be found in Sci-Fi novels.

Frederick B Johnson is a writer for Milliamp LTD, a company that can repair an iPhone for anyone on the planet.

Support for SEO Indonesia